Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Beckwith Johnson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge according to previous AFD. The previous AFD closed with consensus to merge this article with Vernon O. Johnson. Any discussion about what (if any) content is to be merged, or whether a better title can be found for the resultant article, should be had on the talk page. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 14:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Anne Beckwith Johnson

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Anne Beckwith Johnson
• Articles for deletion/Anne Beckwith Johnson (2nd nomination)

Anne Beckwith Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Merge what?. Article is almost entirely unreferenced original research added by a person closely connected with the subject. Adding this content to another article would violate Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Also, almost all of the relevant information is already included in the Vernon O. Johnson article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 12:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

merge/redirect. The keyword is "almost". Nobody forces you to merge everything or even anything. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:58, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

There is nothing to merge as all of the remaining relevant information is uncited and fails Wikipedia:Verifiability. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:16, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The why are you wasting our time instead of redirecting per first AfD? Clearly, the name is searchable, since she wrote the book about their adventures. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

• speedy close and proceed according the first noncontroversial AfD. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
• Merge to new article - it seems to me that it is the 1960-1961 tour they took, going to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, that meets WP:GNG. By all accounts their visit appears to have in-depth coverage by RS. I would suggest a new article be created for that. The suggestion made by Carrite in the previous AfD, Johnson family peace tour, is suitable. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep (or, well, Speedy Close as Merge) - "Merge what?" was an argument for the original deletion discussion or to bring up on the talk page afterwards. If you didn't agree with the close, it should've gone to DRV, not just re-nominated. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.